How feds plan to use Hunter Biden’s drug-filled memoir against him in weapons case: ‘Feeding the beast’

Prosecutors within the federal gun case in opposition to first son Hunter Biden wish to turn his 2021 memoir “Beautiful Things” back on its author — by submitting excerpts into proof wherein the youthful Biden describes “feeding the beast” of his drug dependancy across the time he is accused of illegally purchasing a pistol.

President Biden’s 54-year-old son is slated to face trial starting June 3 in Delaware on three prices tied to allegations he illegally bought a firearm whereas hooked on crack cocaine on Oct. 12, 2018.

Prosecutors in particular counsel David Weiss’ workplace argued Tuesday that they need to be allowed to indicate the jury sure passages from “Stunning Issues” and play parts of the audiobook — narrated by Hunter Biden himself.

Prosecutors within the Delaware gun case in opposition to Hunter Biden wish to use excerpts from his e book at trial.

On the similar time, they argued, the primary son shouldn’t be allowed to introduce “self-serving” parts of the e book except he’s keen to be cross-examined on the witness stand.

A few of the salacious passages that the feds wish to introduce embody one wherein the Biden scion recalled that “[b]y the time my airplane touched down in Los Angeles in March 2019, I had no plan past the moment-to-moment calls for of the crack pipe.”

Hunter Biden additionally described the time interval round when he bought the Colt Cobra revolver by saying: “I hardly went wherever now, besides to purchase.

“It was me and a crack pipe in a Tremendous 8 [motel], not understanding which the f—okay means was up. All my vitality revolved round smoking medicine and making preparations to purchase medicine — feeding the beast.”

In his e book “Stunning Issues: A Memoir,” Hunter Biden describes himself as being hooked on crack cocaine from 2016 by 2019. AFP through Getty Photos

Prosecutors individually claimed Tuesday that Hunter Biden’s authorized group shouldn’t be allowed to argue or recommend at trial that the feds should show that he was truly on medicine the day he purchased the weapon.

There’s “overwhelming proof of his dependancy earlier than, throughout, and after the interval when he possessed the gun,” prosecutors wrote.

For example, they mentioned, the day after he purchased the firearm, Hunter Biden messaged somebody saying, “I’m now off MD Av behind blue rocks stadium ready for a seller named Mookie.”

However, prosecutors say Hunter Biden shouldn’t be allowed to indicate jurors the “self-serving” parts of his e book except he’s keen to be cross-examined about it on the witness stand. Getty Photos

The following day, Oct. 14, 2018, he despatched a message to the identical good friend saying, “I used to be sleeping on a automobile smoking crack on 4th avenue and Rodney,” the court docket papers declare.

Hunter’s sister-in-law-turned-lover, Hallie Biden, ditched the gun on Oct. 23 — 11 days after he purchased it — prompting an angry outburst from the now-first son.

The youthful Biden faces a second prison case in Los Angeles on tax evasion prices and is slated to go to trial in that case June 20.

On Friday, his attorneys requested for a pause of the LA case whereas they enchantment a decide’s ruling tossing their bid to have the costs thrown out.

The decide has but to resolve whether or not he’ll grant the postponement.

Final week, the Third Circuit Court docket of Appeals rejected Hunter Biden’s request to toss the gun charges.

Biden is charged with two counts of constructing false statements and one rely of firearm possession by an illegal substance abuser and faces as much as 25 years behind bars if convicted on all counts.

Prosecutors within the Delaware federal gun case in opposition to Hunter Biden wish to use his personal phrases from his e book and audiobook in opposition to him at trial. AFP through Getty Photos

Hunter had been slated to take a sweetheart plea deal final summer season, however it blew up after prosecutors and a decide mentioned the deal wouldn’t shield him from other potential charges — which have been later introduced in opposition to him within the tax case.

The primary son’s attorneys didn’t instantly return a request for remark Tuesday morning.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *